Talk:Kristen Bjorn

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Ww2censor in topic COI tag (November 2022)

Fair use rationale for Image:ManlyBeachC.jpeg

edit
 

Image:ManlyBeachC.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have removed the disclaimer from the external link. it violates Wikipedia:No disclaimers in articles. It is also silly and unnecessary, anyone going to a porn stars website should expect to see a porn star naked.Carritotito (talk) 07:24, 9 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced, alleged birth name

edit

I've deleted the unsourced purported birth name of the subject of this article. Please do not reinsert it without discussion and a clear consensus on this talk page. At a minimum, it needs a source. But beyond that, WP:BLP counsels against "outing" the birth names of people who purposely obscure them, by use of a stage name, in certain occupations. Porn actor/director/producer is the paradigm for such a profession. The article loses nothing if the unsourced, purported birth is omitted. It's very unlikely that even a sourced, accurate birth name would add anything useful to the article. But if someone has a source and feels strongly that the name should be included, come, let us reason together, here on this talk page. David in DC (talk) 19:04, 31 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

COI tag (November 2022)

edit

The editor has the same name as the subject, so likely a COI. ww2censor (talk) 19:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply