Talk:Kult (role-playing game)

Unnamed Section

Should this page be moved to Kult (game) or Kult (rpg) since there is now a Kult (band) article as well?

Perhaps? Why not? As long as it isnt a *big* problem, we dont need to do nothing about it :) Noone 10:59, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Unless the band's name is The Kult or similar. If this is the case, the band's article should not be the same as this one's at all.

Kult and Occult Organisations

I would rather say that the game Kult draws on similarities and magical orders based on millennia-old beliefs systems, not the opposite, honestly.

I think I agree with you there, I honestly don't know why Dragon Rouge is even mentioned, as the in-game magic does not really contain anything like that. The copy the I own (The English 1st edition, published by Metropolis) contains a large section on magic, in which it disscuss (in a rather exaggerating & dark tone) several occult traditons, the majority of which are old long-practiced world belifes. The only excetion to this is Satanism, which in the game has almost nothing in common with the real-world religion. In Kult they are just the loyal servents of Astroth and his Death Angels.

Above all else, it should be noted that these 'occult traditions,' really have no impact in the way magic is played in the game. Mostly because they are only there to help with the background knowledge, and personaitly of charcters. The actual magical system itself uses a lores/schools of magic like most other RPGs, and ultimatly one's background has no major effect on the magic used in the game. Avador 17:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Rumours say the game and/or its designers were condemned by the papacy. Does anyone have sourced information on this? Johan L 23:06, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

History

The list of editions in different languages is not complete. I own one set of first edition books in german, including the rulebook and OK-KULT (supplement only available in german). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Recombine (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC).

I believe The OK-Kult is not something Germany-specific. The supplement contains parts of other books which have been published in both Swedish and English. See the Swedish Game Master Screen, the English magic books, the Illusion #1 Poster and the Swedish sinkadus magazines. 88.88.112.231 20:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Plagiarism?

This appears to be mostly word-for-word from http://www.kult-rpg.com/wiki/kult - it would appear someone has lifted one from the other. - 203.87.69.229 07:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

They have adapted our text, not vice versa, I think. Their earliest draft is from January, and I compared our drafts from that time to theirs, and it seems the relevant passages appeared here first. --Agamemnon2 11:41, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Very true. Sorry about that. I suspect it was copied over because the article here has been edited by some of the members on www.kult-rpg.com. Anyways, I hope I've cleaned it up now. -torb 88.88.112.231 20:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Massive cleanup needed.

This article needs some cleaning. I have corrected smaller mistakes here and there, but in general the article has sections with very akward syntax. I surmise that some of the contributors may not have English as their primary language. Any help would be much appreciated.

80.196.177.84 (talk) 10:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kult (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724190812/http://bjorn.foxtail.nu/rollspel/krit_motion.htm to http://bjorn.foxtail.nu/rollspel/krit_motion.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041122204807/http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,246481,00.html to http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/nyheter/story/0,2789,246481,00.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://pub.tv2.no/dyn-nettavisen/arkiv/?archiveSection=765&archiveItem=140520

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Cleanup needed

Things to fix:

General update because of the new edition.

It is not possible to say 1st edition was less action-oriented than subsequent ones, after all, it did feature an extensive guns section. The new edition (Divinity Lost) should be presented as focusing more on mystery and psychological horror than action, because that's how its Apocalypse Now engine works (=its not a simulationist or detail-oriented rpg engine).

Better organization: clearly say what edition each paragraph talks about. Some sections speak as if there aren't different editions with wildly different rulesets.

Pruning OR: ttrpg articles are notoriously difficult to source, but the current article contains too much OR.

More?

CapnZapp (talk) 08:53, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Cover image

I noticed the recent attempt to provide a 4th edition cover picture. While probably made in good-faith, the attempt will likely be deleted because the uploader did not successfully navigate the honestly very tricky waters of picture licenses and permissions.

In this case, the picture we want is clearly NOT free, and so the correct approach is to clearly state this in the uploading. Instead of being asked to prove you have permission, you should argue your upload meets the definition of "fair use" per WP:NFCI. Most movie posters would fall into this category, for instance. Do upload a very small low-res version (or a bot will come around and mangle your picture for you) per WP:IMAGERES.

Also, since WP:NOTCENSORED, the original cover picture is here if you want to give it another go. Cheers CapnZapp (talk) 00:57, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Took a stab at uploading the picture following the requirements to the best of my ability. If this fails I would appreciate someone telling me what I did wrong. CapnZapp (talk)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• KULT Divinity Lost.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:06, 6 September 2019 (UTC)