Notability, quality of the writing, grammar, translation.

edit

1. This article reads like a padded resume and there is nothing described here that is notable above what would be expected from a career academic.

2. After reviewing the corresponding article in the Japanese Wikipedia it is clear that this article is a translation. I will add a translated article tag to reflect this. I note that the original author of the Japanese Wikiarticle created that article from Haba's professional home page.

3. The translation is rough and the writing poor both in Japanese and English. However I see no necessity in improving this article unless the WP notability requirements are met.

4. The article is getting about 1 visit a day Dr.khatmando (talk) 06:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I would agree that the article is poorly written and poorly sourced, but not that she's not notable. She's possibly the most prominent Japanese academic in IR currently. She's also the leader of the Asia-Pacific region for ISA. The risk with saying that she's not notable enough is that it reads like a typical, she's a woman academic so she's not notable which Wikipedia is well known for. Also, let's remember that Japan is a very patriarchal society so achieving such success is rare.
On some sources, here is the source on her ISA leadership:
https://www.isanet.org/ISA/Regions/Asia-Pacific/Leadership
Also, there's linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kumiko-haba-88556741
As well as her cv if you google it but it's extremely out of date. EsotIR (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kumiko Haba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:41, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply