Talk:Kunduz Province
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Kunduz Province be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comments
editThis is an interesting article. We should have more of this type of articles. Mkland (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- I have reverted edits by an anon IP, most likely that of a banned user, and restored the previous sourced information. Tajik (talk) 22:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
No mention of large numbers of civilian casualties in the Kunduz Province
editNo mention of the 142 civilians reported to have been killed by German troops?
Evidence of civilian casualties
editHow about at least a single line mention of the Kunduz airstrike and its casualties?
Aliabad
editAliabad has a Pashtun-Uzbek population. The district is dominated by Uzbeks but Pashtuns represent the governeur. The number of Tajiks is there nearly zero. --188.107.4.206 (talk) 15:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
Demographics
editAll sources agree that there is a Pashtun majority in Kunduz Province. Here is one credible source. More sources can be added if needed.
- Constraints to Growth in Northeastern Afghanistan - Harvard - "It is the only province in the Northeast with a Pashtun majority ..."
(Ketabtoon (talk) 04:23, 9 July 2011 (UTC))
I am not from Afghanistan, but i can clearly see that when it comes to articles from Afghanistan.. the articles are extremely anti pashtuns.. Provinces which everyone knows are pashtun majority example Farah, Badghais, and Kundaz are shown as some other ethnic group.. no wonder wikipedia is not accepted as reliable source in colleges/universities.. Tigerkhan007 (talk) 07:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kunduz Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121002214003/http://www.nps.edu/programs/ccs/Kunduz/Kunduz_Executive_2009.pdf to http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz_Executive_2009.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150628124105/http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz.html to http://www.nps.edu/Programs/CCS/Kunduz/Kunduz.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Removal of 'Demographics' column in Districts section
editTook a look over the 'demographics' column in the Districts section. Only one district has a source listed that worked (Ali Abad) and it was completely wrong. Originally the wiki page showed 73% Tajik, 11% Pashtuns, 8% Hazara, 8% Uzbek while the source it referenced showed something completely different (47% Pashtuns, 33% Tajik, 12% Hazara, 8% Uzbek).... So I went ahead and fixed that. The rest of the column is unsourced and very likely incorrect.
Look at a previously listed source (Naval Postgraduate school). It lists the ethnic groups as follows:
Pashtun: 33% Uzbek: 27% Tajik: 22% Turkmen: 11% Hazara: 6% Pashai: 1%
It goes on to say:
"Gilzhai Pashtuns comprise 33% of the population of Kunduz and are the majority ethnic group in the province. They are primarily found in Imam Sahib District."
The numbers from the Imam Sahib district in the table read as: 35% Turkmens 30% Uzbeks, 20% Tajiks, 15% Pashtuns
So per the source (Naval Postgraduate School): the major ethnic group of the province who are primarily found in the Imam Sahib district comprise only 15% of Imam Sahib district. Clearly this is incorrect.
Removing all data in the 'Demographics' column that is unsourced. WikiEditUsername7 (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism
editPlease lock this page the some users want minimize Tajik population. Hisksjueeu (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Hisksjueeu: If you want to request page protection, you may do so at WP:RfPP. —Danre98(talk^contribs) 14:17, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)