Untitled

edit

The introduction now reads "He is said to have contacted ..." Are there any doubts about this? Get-back-world-respect 05:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

The whole article reads completely POV, imo it should be scrapped if its not changed. --86.2.153.77 12:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

I read today (30 september 2006) in Swedish news paper "Svenska Dagbladet" that that he was officially acquitted for any participation in the holocaust. In the article here on WP it says that he aided in the massmurder, this must be changed! --Mailerdaemon 22:39, 29 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Suggestions (comments moved from article)

edit

Comment by 66.238.96.46 , moved from article to here. --Singkong2005 · talk 23:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

[[ The reference to the Hochhuth work is inaccurate: it was a play, not a novel; furthermore,the controversy arising due to Hochhuths documentation of these events should be emphasized. Should be linked to Wiki entry: The Deputy Also: Wiki should begin work on semantic linking of items in different language name spaces]] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.238.96.46 (talkcontribs)

"semantic linking of items in different language" - perhaps you're looking for the interlanguage links, to the same article in different languages (which are listed in the left column, under the heading "In other languages")? --Singkong2005 · talk 23:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article is very unbalanced, as it gives the impression that all of Gerstein claims are undisputed fact. The following information should be included - in his first signed memorandum (April 26 1945,) Gerstein claimed that 25 million concentration camp internees had been gassed, but in his second signed memorandum (May 4 1945, only 1 week later!) he had mysteriously reduced the figure to 6 million. The article should also refer to the book "The Confessions of Kurt Gerstein" by Henri Roques, which systematically demonstrates that much of what Gerstein claims is nonsense. Logicman1966 07:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC) Wow - discredited by an anti-semitic Revisionist Historian who'd probably like to pretend all the camp inmates died from self induced disease caused by poor personal hygiene! A quote from an article penned by him says it all "everyone has the right to believe, to deny or to doubt the existence of the gas chambers." Still and all God will judge all these liars and their attempts to talk away the murder of so many people.Reply

Student Fraternity Teutonia

edit

there is sayd Teutonia to be one of the most Nationalit Fraternitys in Germiny. My Brother ist a Member of the Corps Teutonia. There are Members of all Nations. So we should renew this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Macjena (talkcontribs) 22:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Maybe now there all nations are admitted in Teutonia but it was certainly not the case one century ago. --Moumine70 (talk) 19:12, 28 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Henri Roques Reference

edit

The book referred to and its author were long ago discredited as anti-semitic revisionism. See: Vidal-Naquet It has been removed a number of times. --Joel Mc (talk) 15:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

edit

Article reassessed and graded as B class. Good job. --dashiellx (talk) 16:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Le mur rose

edit

I find no reference anywhere that the French gendarmes found the painting while they were investigating Gerstein's crimes. After all, they were found three years after his suicide; the French cops can be slow, mais quand meme. Not surprisingly, none of the English-speaking press that I have seen, including the Beeb and the NYT, seem to have clue who this guy was. Figaro is a little better http://www.lefigaro.fr/culture/2008/11/24/03004-20081124ARTFIG00360-la-france-restitue-un-matisse-vole-par-les-nazis-.php Joel Mc (talk) 13:40, 26 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kurt Gerstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kurt Gerstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Pierre Joffroy - A Spy For God (1971) - How is it credible not to mention this

edit

I first became aware of Gerstein in 1971 at school by reading Pierre Joffroy's detailed book on the life and career of Gerstein.

How can this article be in any way credible with the total omission of this as a very detailed biography of this unfortunate man?

(Michael Wills) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.64.102.212 (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply