Talk:LB&SCR A1 class

Fair use rationale for Image:Stepney.jpg

Image:Stepney.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Peer review

LB&SCR A1 class

I'm nominating this article for peer review as I have been engaged in a considerable amount of work in bringing this article up to be far more detailed and encompassing of the history and current situation of the class than it was beforehand. I am of the belief that this article is now a higher quality than the B grade it currently has on the quality scale and would hope that this may lead to an improvement on that level, and also in the hope that someone will be able to suggest where the article could go from here to be further improved as a fresh set of eyes.Bluebellnutter (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments from Das48

Here are a few initial suggestions for you to consider.

Infobox

Add |designer = William Stroudley

Add |fuelcap = 0 tons 10 cwt

Add |watercap = 500 gallons

Amend |railroadclass = LBSC: A1/A1X

Intro

Your article introduction is far too long and wordy for the article also introduces several items not mentioned in the main text. I suggest you keep it to the basic outline only. In particular I suggest you delete or move the following from the intro:

"A pub of this name on the island was briefly home to the engine which is now No.W8 Freshwater.

"out of London Bridge and London Victoria"

"With these new uses being found"

Other comments re Intro

The terriers were superseded from their original work during the late 1890s by the D1 and D3 classes, the elevated electrics were not used until after 1909.

"non-revenue earning work such as shunting" - shunting can either be revenue earning (yard shunting) or non-revenue earning (e.g. works shuninting). I think Departmental mught be a better description of non-revenue earning tasks.

There is far too much about Hayling Island in the intro, but you might add a subheading under History below to talk about their role in keeping the Hayling Branch going.

History

Perhaps this needs a little background - the LB&SCR was almost bankrupt in 1867, needed to increase revenues without building new lines, by developing new suburban traffic. First task given to Stroudley in 1870 was to develop a suitable locomotive, but funds not available to build until 1872.

"the heavily congested lines in South and South-East London" - the lines were certainly not "heavily congested" in 1870-72, but there was a need to develop new commuter traffic.

"the line from Victoria to London Bridge" suggest link to South London line

The LB&SCR Locomotive Committee decided in January 1899 to reduce the number of terriers to 15 through sales or scrapping((Bradley p.156). Fifteen were scrapped 1901-1903. The remaing members of the class began to be renumbered in the Duplicate list from January 1900.

Livery - suggest this has a separate subheading

I suggest you add a new A1X sub-heading to deal with reboilered locos seperately as these became the bulk of the survivors

I suggest you might add a subheading or a table to deal with the alienated locos as 25 were sold out of service. D.L. Bradley has all the details.

Assessment

I wonder whether you might add some assessment about the remarkable class - why were they so successful and long-lived? why have so many been preserved? Is it because they were reliable, versatile, strong but lightweight (the key factor in their use by Light Railways and on the Hayling Branch)? Bradley discusses the reasons for their success pp.152-3.

I will spend a bit more time later and add a few more comments:--Das48 (talk) 22:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LB&SCR A1 class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080509062550/http://www.iwsteamrailway.co.uk/pages/latest%20news/W11%20Boiler%20Announcement%20Nov%2007.htm to http://www.iwsteamrailway.co.uk/pages/latest%20news/W11%20Boiler%20Announcement%20Nov%2007.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

'Avoiding duplication / overlap / inconsistencies' It might be a good idea to merge this article with List of LB&SCR A1 class locomotives. ShropshirePilgrim (talk) 11:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)