Talk:LFG Roland G.I

Latest comment: 8 years ago by SSTflyer in topic Requested move 1 May 2016

Requested move 1 May 2016

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved per lack of opposition. SSTflyer 01:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply



LFG Roland G 1LFG Roland G.I – standard dot and roman numeral naming format as per multiple refs, incl here and here - NiD.29 (talk) 02:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 22:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Agree that the number should be Roman. Contemporary sources used it (eg the Jane's cited in article) and so does the cited, fairly authoritative Grey and Thetford book. Whether it is G.I (Jane's) or G I (G&T) is a minor point, so long as we have redirects.TSRL (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
The convention on almost all modern references is to use the dot, as it is for most of the wiki pages for German aircraft of the era. There are a few occasions where it is helpful to distinguish between the German military's designation and company designation systems.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.