Talk:LGA 1150

Mainstream LGA1155 v Enthusiast LGA2011

If you know it, please add the answer. Is LGA1150 the successor only to the Intel "mainstream" LGA1155 socket or also to the Intel "enthusiast" LGA2011 socket? Intel uses these two categories for all their processor sockets and I cannot find an answer concerning the "enthuasiast" class socket for Haswell Extreme CPUs. 37.136.44.70 (talk) 12:53, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it will be here entusianist 2011 version called (surprisingly) 2011-3 based for hasell procesors :). 88.102.84.189 (talk) 13:49, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

PCI support ?

There's Z87 based Intel mainboards with PCI http://ark.intel.com/fr/compare/75010,70903,72031,69045,70898

But the Z87 chipset spec shows it has no PCI support http://ark.intel.com/fr/products/75013/Intel-DH82Z87-PCH?q=z87

Same for most chipsets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FCartegnie (talk • contribs) 12:53, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Well, chipset ITSELF doesn't support PCI, but that don't prevent mainboard manufactures to add PCI support themselves via another chipset. 88.102.84.189 (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Xeon chipset?

The article mentions "C228", but there's no such thing at ark.intel.com. However, there IS a C226, and Asus even has released P9D WS. So, the "c228" is definitely a mistake, duplicated thousandfolds across the Internet. Bolkhov (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

DDR 3 slots

It is possible to add here how many DDR 3 slots each chipset support ? (2,4,8) and how much max ram (16,32,64). 88.102.84.189 (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

compatibility

My current computer has an LGA1155 socket. My understanding when I bought the machine was that the mainboard would be compatible with "all" (???) future 22nm processors. It would be nice if these articles discussed the compatibility issue. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 18:40, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

LGA 1150 not exist Titel change LGA 1150 (FCLGA 1150)

Intel listed: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.138.6.179 (talk) 06:10, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

LGA 1155 exist.

FCLGA 1150 exist.

I dont know the diffrence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.138.6.179 (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Source for the lack of support of Intel Clear Video Technology when using chipset H81 ?

Does there exist a source for the alleged lack of support for Intel Clear Video Technology(indicated by "No" in the table) when using chipset H81 ?
In particular, since the last sentence of the second paragraph is contradicting this: "All socket 1150 motherboards support varying video outputs (VGA, DVI, HDMI - depending on the model) and Intel Clear Video Technology." --Cmskog (talk) 18:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm fairly certain that section is completely incorrect, and looking through the Intel 8-series chipset documentation yields no relevant distinction between them in that regard. - 209.23.204.4 (talk) 05:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

It's supported by the H81 chipset. Sources: [1] [2] I have removed this section from the table as the relevant information is already present in the header of the article. Artem-S-Tashkinov (talk) 18:53, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

PCIe support of chipsets

None of LGA1150 chipsets support PCIe 3.0 standard. Example : http://ark.intel.com/products/75004 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyathalae (talk • contribs) 12:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Nice catch, thank you! The table in LGA 1150 § First generation section also (wrongly) attempts to list what's supported directly by the CPU. However, that's quite confusing, so went ahead and deleted that information, while also clarifying a bit what's listed in the remaining table row. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 15:58, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGA 1150. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109205921/http://game.msi.com/news?List=42&N=2606 to http://game.msi.com/news?List=42&N=2606

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:03, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Corrected misinformation that had been there for four years

I wouldn't mention this normally, but I tracked down the user who added the bit about Flex I/O allowing 10 PCIe lanes to be used on H97 and Z97.

It was me. December 28, 2014. Four years and a couple months ago.

I'm sorry about that. Section 5.1 of the datasheet for the chipsets contradicts this, explicitly saying that only 8 PCIe lanes are usable at any one time: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/us/en/documents/datasheets/8-series-chipset-pch-datasheet.pdf 161.6.164.145 (talk) 22:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)