Talk:LGBTQ rights in Bolivia

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Cyanmax in topic Civil unions

English

edit

Is there an "english version" of the new gay-friendly consitution? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.207.230 (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

You can copy parts into [1]. Hekerui (talk) 13:17, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

Bolivia adopted a new Penal Code in 1834, which is still in effect today, so this is probably a year when Bolivia legalized homosexuality, as the code was modeled on Brazilian one. [2] page 52. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.51.136.157 (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights in Bolivia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Bolivia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Legitimacy of PlanetRomeo reference

edit

The reference to the site "PlanetRomeo" that should contain data about a so-called "Gay Happiness Index" does not seem to contain that information. I looked it up on Google and found the report. The survey was conducted among people that visit their website PlanetRomeo.com, which is - to my superficial knowledge of how social sciences should work - not a good way to find reliable data. What's more, the number of Bolivian participants was 31. Again, I'm not an expert, but this can't be enough. I suggest this part of the text gets deleted by someone who is more certain of the illegitimacy of this source. Perhaps it's also a good idea to check other wiki pages on gay rights whether they contain this source too. Andeosr (talk) 09:05, 20 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Civil unions

edit

The civil registry continues to bar same-sex couples from registering civil unions.

The same-sex couple, foreign citizens who legally reside in Bolivia, applied to La Paz civil registry in May 2021 to register a civil union. In a June letter, the civil registry asserted that there is no current procedure to register same-sex unions in the country. The letter ignores that the civil registry recognized the union of David Aruquipa and Guido Montaño, a gay couple, in December 2020, based on a lower court order. The civil registry claimed it needs to wait until Bolivia’s Plurinational Constitutional Court reviews the lower court ruling ordering Aruquipa and Montano’s registration. The July ruling is now under review by the Constitutional Court and will have implications for all same-sex couples in the country. Therefore, I suggest to avoid premature conclusions and to await the decision of the the Constitutional Court.

Source: https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/07/08/bolivia-lesbian-couple-denied-registration-union# Cyanmax (talk) 06:26, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply