Talk:LGBTQ rights in Turkey

Latest comment: 9 months ago by DutchManfromtheEast in topic Is there a reliable source for legalization back in 1858?

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2020 and 24 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Fatihbaruch98.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 January 2019 and 18 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Khandrius0824.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

LGBT rights since 1858?!

edit

By that time, there wasn't even a country called Turkey. It was the Ottoman Empire and this page needs a lot of modification. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.43.104.175 (talk) 00:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Politics in relation to LGBT rights in Turkey

edit

I would suggest adding more about the Halkların Demokratik Partisi, more commonly known as the HDP. The party just gained entry into parliament and is quite progressive on LGBT rights, including quotas to an extent. This could be a good, modern example in contrast to the AKP, which most recently disallowed the pride parade in Istanbul in June of 2015. With the CHP differing by region, but often being moderately progressive on LGBT rights, I believe a section on the topic would be interesting and informative. DCirillo14 (talk) 18:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)DCirillo14Reply

Photographic proof?

edit

Homosexuals in the military are asked to provide photographic proof? This seems to crazy, I looked for more information to add to the article but couldn't. Could anyone clarify on how this [disgusting] process works? I think the sentence is a bit confusing and thought-provoking. --Dan LeveilleTALK 08:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually it's not always necessary, but sometimes they ask for it, and plus you have to be "bottom" in the action when photo is taken. Weird really. I really wonder if they keep those photos, it might be the oldest archive of gay porn in the world! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.110.191.77 (talk) 17:14, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Prohibition of men kissing each other in public in Adana

edit

"For example, it was once reported that in Adana males were prohibited from kissing in public, on the cheek. However, there has been no evidence of enforcement of this regulation. Men kissing as a form of greeting is common in Turkey."

Adana males were not prohibited from kissing in public. This was a campaign launched by the mayor Aytaç Durak for men not to kiss each other when greeting. Since it was a campaign, it was only encouragement, so there was never enforcement. Plus, this has not much to do with LGBT community and therefore it is not really necessary to be part of this article. In many European countries where LGBT right recognized in full, men do not kiss each other when greeting.Seyhan668 (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LGBT rights in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:52, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Turkey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Is there a reliable source for legalization back in 1858?

edit

I checked the cited link's paper. In that paper, the writer cites " Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, p438" as a back-up for his assertion. Can anyone check the book? Google book's review does not feature the cited page. What source do they cite? How can we be sure the quoted book quotes a reliable source? Ottomans legalizing something can be backed-up by decrees they signed or by contemporary newspapers and even contemporary newspapers' reliability and accuracy is up to discussion. We shall either find a source or delete the related content as it may turn out to be a baseless assertion. --Sir artur (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

It is actually a myth that homosexuality was legalised in 1858, see "Decolonizing Decriminalization Analyses: Did the Ottomans Decriminalize Homosexuality in 1858?" In fact, punishments were made more severe due to the penal code reforms. I want to change the article, but I am yet to find a source to when the Turkish Republic actually legalised homosexuality. DutchManfromtheEast (talk) 07:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

This article has a long section on age of consent and the various legalities of sex with young people. I fail to understand how this is relevant in an LGBT article. This should be explained in a separate article, which it probably already is. Link to that.

LGBT is unrelated to child exploitation. 196.65.133.134 (talk) 20:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reassignment surgeries is not under a prohibited status by law

edit

The prohibition of sex reassignment surgery is not even a proposal yet. Until it became a law, it shouldn't be there like a fact. There is not even a source for it. The possibility of the proposal could be added later in the article with a reference for it. Should be fixed. Mehmetcontaci (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2022 (UTC)Reply