Talk:LGBTQ rights in Vietnam

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2402:800:61B1:872B:70ED:914B:2F0B:AE1F in topic Military services

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 November 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tonitran2003. Peer reviewers: Kealla, Meemakter, Sunnycxz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Spell out the acronym first, please

edit

Might be a good idea to spell out the acronym in the headline so that the article's subject is clear.

Not to mention that the article seems to be exclusively about homosexuals, not bisexuals or transgendered persons. Frankwomble 18:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I believe that is is WP's standard to call this type of article "LGBT rights in nation" GeekX (talk) 11:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

POV

edit

The content of this article mainly try to describe how the Vietnamese Goverment supressed the rights of LGBT and try to prove that the Vietnamese goverment violates the LGBT rights. Furthermore, the article's content show a dark image of LGBT discrimination, despite the fact that the society and the media is relatively tolerant to the LGBT cases now. The foreign sources of the article seems do not reflect accurately about the situation in Vietnam. This article should be seriously upgraded. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've replaced the fortunecity.com ref by {{fact}} per self-published source, unless someone can provide a substitution I will remove the tagged information in about one week. Grenouille vert (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Could you point out which passage you consider POV? All the facts in this article seem to be also present in the Vietnamese-language article. DHN (talk) 17:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
So there's just the thread creator stressing the situation at the end of the Civil Rights § and the well supported earlier text, in a juxtaposition reflecting the living contradiction of the historical situation in roughly the current time. So nothing to do, not POV, just not a simple black-white situation, except for the support for statement like "like many other societies, Vietnam has expressed homophobia and archaic attitudes about homosexuality which have recently been changing". 72.228.177.92 (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on LGBT rights in Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

The last sentence in the History section, which talks about the age of consent being 16 in Vietnam regardless of gender or sexual orientation feels out of place. Should we remove it or put it somewhere else in the article? Hoang1nguyen (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistency betweem summaries

edit

summary table below says surgery and legal gender changes are allowed, page box up top says they're banned 185.134.5.47 (talk) 09:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Military services

edit

Actually in the health certificates for you to apply for the military (at least for women as men are obligated to join the armed forces) have a section that requires you being confirmed a hetero by a psychiatrist to be able to serve because all other sexual orientations are considered "mentally ill" (crazy right?) and thus not eligible. Nobody cares about that requirement anyway but it's there. So should we change the article in that regard? (speaking from my own experience applying to the army and saw people lying about their sexuality to get through) 1.55.164.143 (talk) 06:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Are there any reliable sources that supported this claim? If there are, please add that to the page. This is Wikipedia, so you can edit pages like this. 2402:800:61B1:872B:70ED:914B:2F0B:AE1F (talk) 15:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply