 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Redirect?
editThere is so little content here I'm inclined to redirect it to LIBIS KB-6. I'll wait for comment though, and in the meantime add it to that page as another variant after the LIBIS 160. Still needs a ref - the Slovenian wiki article does not have one either.TSRL (talk) 16:29, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Do not make a redirect. This is not the subtype of the KB-6 aircraft. This plane was newly developed at the time. Thank you very much Nareto 14:54, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- Can you supply a ref? Though the LIBIS 160 is described in detail in Jane's 1964/5, the group is not mentioned again. Do you know its history?. Cheers,TSRL (talk) 20:27, 20 September 2017 (UTC) Where, for example does the data come from? I note the dimensions and wing area are the same as the original KB-6; what, engine apart, were the differences.TSRL (talk) 20:48, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
- Something to consider: if you set up your Sandbox, you can develop articles away from other editors, then upload it when you're happy with it. I found this route a great improvement; for example, if ypu get stuck you can leave it safely alone until you've solved any problems, then restart.TSRL (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2017 (UTC)