Talk:LM3LABS

Hello, The text has been amended according to requests and matching close company description (i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_motion). Thank you for bringing more precise details on remaining problem. We trust your impartiality.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nloeillot (talk • contribs) 00:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)--Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 10:40, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

rewrite as of 18:21, 4 November 2024 UTC [refresh]

I have re-written the article to add references, integrate them as inline citations, remove the over-long lists of clients and products, and generally make it more encyclopedic instead of being the press release it previously was. I suggest the previous editor brings concerns or suggestions here instead of directly editing the article page to prevent difficulties with conflict of interest issues. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 10:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

I have removed the obvious marketing section from the Leap Motion article that was placed there by user Nloeillot, who apparently is Nicolas Loeillot, mentioned in the section I removed. Is this a new crappy low level of marketing that we can expect to be seeing? Gandydancer (talk) 14:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks @Gandydancer. I have cleaned up and watchlisted the Leap Motion page. I usually find these by doing searches for common promotional terms or phrases. For example, I cleaned up dozens of articles that referred to a pay for play award, Network Products Guide. I think if we identify other pay for play awards and search for areas where they are referenced on Wikipedia, that should be an effective way to find articles that need cleanup. This one came up in one of the various searches mentioned here. Admittedly I had not thought of that before. CorporateM (Talk) 15:16, 12 November 2013 (UTC)