Talk:LYFE Kitchen

Comments on recent article expansion

Broadly, looks very good. You've cited nicely (i.e. for the sentences that I reviewed, you'd placed the cite at the end of the string of sentences that it is covering (and it really does cover them - not always a given here!), rather than doing repeat cites for each sentence). You've not over wikilinked. Your sourcing looks to be reliable too; there are some press releases being used, which is generally not a good idea.

The Global Animal Partnership point needs a cite (immediately after the comma), as there's no mention of LYFE on the cite at the end of the sentence. Funnily enough, this is something that a press release (e.g. this) might reasonably be used for, if you can't find it in a normal 3rd party source.

I'd trim the lead. Not remove, but move much of it to the body. Personally I'd do that for everything other than the first sentence, but others may feel differently.

The tone of the article is a little promotional (i.e. we probably don't need know that unfried chicken is their best seller and the use of some of the sentence openers, like In addition, each LYFE Kitchen . . . is unnecessary). It also goes into too much detail (i.e. To facilitate easier local sourcing, LYFE alternates menu items seasonally, such as their Brussels sprouts being substituted with asparagus in the spring and summer months. Menu items also vary regionally: Colorado menus feature bison burgers and tacos, Texas has a larger variety of Tex-Mex fare, and New York introduced more predominately Asian-influenced dishes.).

Likewise, it relies too much on quotes. This - We chose Palo Alto because of the people, because of the innovative spirit here. Because a lot of early adopters to movements that move across the country start here in California. We can get our produce here fresh, local, organic, hormone-free, antibiotic-free, all within a hundred miles of Palo Alto - is, for example, not necessary.

Anyway, all this is just my opinion. Hope it helps. Bromley86 (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LYFE Kitchen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150506015539/http://restaurant.lyfekitchen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/LYFE-Kitchen-DELOS-Well-Certified.pdf to http://restaurant.lyfekitchen.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/LYFE-Kitchen-DELOS-Well-Certified.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Company information out of date

I would appreciate some help in getting this page up to date. The company has undergone numerous changes since the last update and the information provided is no longer accurate. Naj42181 (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Naj42181 (talk) 22:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I would be happy to help, but I would need some concrete change proposals from you. I do not have the time to go out and do the research for you, but I can certainly get any proposed changes reviewed and implemented. ~ Rick305 t·c 23:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)