Talk:L-class blimp
(Redirected from Talk:L class blimp)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by TowerDragon in topic “ZNN-L” designation
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L-class blimp article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
“ZNN-L” designation
editAccording to ZNN, L-class blimps have been designated “ZNN-L”, but this is not mentioned in the article. According to MOS:DABMENTION, the link on the Dab page would have to be removed. TowerDragon (talk) 01:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Proposed move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 06:24, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- L class blimp → L-class blimp
- M class blimp → M-class blimp
- G class blimp → G-class blimp
- N class blimp → N-class blimp
- SS class blimp → SS-class blimp
- J class blimp → J-class blimp
- B class blimp → B-class blimp
- D class blimp → D-class blimp
- Coastal class blimp → Coastal-class blimp
- F class blimp → F-class blimp
- NS class blimp → NS-class blimp
- E class blimp → E-class blimp
- H class blimp → H-class blimp
- SSZ class blimp → SSZ-class blimp
- SSP class blimp → SSP-class blimp
- SST class blimp → SST-class blimp
- C-Star class blimp → C-Star-class blimp
- TC class blimp → TC-class blimp
– MOS:HYPHEN and WP:NC-SHIPS recommend use of a hyphen for compound modifiers. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 04:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Strong Support for all: it's not an "L blimp" that also happens to be a "class blimp" so the hyphenlessness here seems like a pretty glaring grammatical error to me.--Xiaphias (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support – there's no reason not to use the standard clear English orthography that helps readers parse these as blimp class modifiers. Book sources for these are dominated by wiki mirrors, but there a are quite books a few non-WP for "K-class blimp", which we have correct already. Dicklyon (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Support – even speedy. Does not have to wait. HandsomeFella (talk) 20:06, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.