Talk:LaTroy Hawkins

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kncny11 in topic GA Review

LaTroy Hawkins Fan Club

edit

I would think it would qualify as a reliable source since it's ESPN, but it is also a blog, so whatever. I won't put it in myself but if someone else wants to, be my guest. At the very least, it's quite interesting. Makes me really like Hawk.

http://espn.go.com/blog/spring-training/post/_/id/1976/latroy-hawkins-and-family

Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on LaTroy Hawkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:LaTroy Hawkins/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kncny11 (talk · contribs) 20:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey there! I'm going to be taking a look at this article. Any section marked with a   Working tag means that I'm not finished combing through it yet, but feel free to start making changes as soon as you see them! Kncny11 (shoot) 20:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lede

edit
  • Mention the saves against all 30 teams here, as it's kind of a big deal
  • Maybe add a quick sentence at the end about how the Twins hired him after his retirement, just to tie it all together

Amateur career

edit

Minnesota Twins

edit
  • Exact day for his 1995 MLB career start?
  • Use fractions for innings, i.e. 1+23.
  • Promoted again to the majors in September,
  • Altogether, Hawkins made six starts in the 1995 season with a link to 1995 MLB season
  • Comma after "in the Twins' rotation as well"
  • Pipe 1996 to 1996 MLB season
  • Pipe 1997 to 1997 MLB season
  • While I'm here, pipe the first instance of "start" to Games started
  • "his 12 losses tied him with 11 other pitchers fro 10th in the American League" tenth what? (I'm assuming tenth most losses?)
  • "In 1998, Hawkins spent an entire season in the Twins' rotation for the first time." → "1998 was the first year that Hawkins spent an entire season in the Twins' rotation."
  • "For the second year in a row in 1999" → "In 1999, for the second year in a row,"
  • Mention what team he blew the May 5 save against

Chicago Cubs

edit

San Francisco Giants

edit
  • This looks good!

Baltimore Orioles

edit

Colorado Rockies

edit
  • "Against the Boston Red Sox, he pitched the last inning of games 1 and 3," → "There, he pitched the last inning of Games 1 and 3 against the Boston Red Sox,"
  • Mention to whom he gave up the run

New York Yankees

edit
  • This section also looks good!

Houston Astros

edit

Milwaukee Brewers

edit
  • A couple more details on the shoulder injury would be nice (duration, type of injury if you can find it)

Los Angeles Angels

edit

New York Mets

edit
  • commas around "with invitation to spring training"
  • "Met's" → "Mets'"
  • Mention the nature of Parnell's injury

Second stint with the Rockies

edit

Toronto Blue Jays

edit

Personal life

edit
  • "Hawkins is married to Anita" is a little awkward. Can probably be combined into one sentence, i.e. "Hawkins and his wife Anita have two children"
  • Would like a little more detail on his job with the Twins. Found some here [2].
  • "young mom" → "young mother"
  • I saw recently that he also helped a TikTok star after a home invasion

References

edit
  • Make sure all sources are archived using the tool, especially anything with limited or subscription-only access
    • I am not willing to click on all the references to do this. I don't have a subscription to everything, and I try to use ones which only allow occasional views as sparingly as possible, in order to utilize them when they contain information difficult to find anywhere else. MLB's tend to expire, so I have attempted to archive all these. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Citations to The Denver Post need "|url-access=limited"
  • Citations to The New York Times need "|url-access=limited"
  • There are 37 citations to his Baseball Reference page. While obviously it's the best resource for his annual, well, stats, you can probably find other sources for the trades to cut down on that a little.

General comments

edit
  • Photos look good
  • Very stable.
  • Earwig score is a little high at 61.3%, but it looks like a mirror site, so I'm unbothered
  • Two big things that I see missing: there is no separate section devoted to his pitching style/scouting reports, and while his consideration in the Baseball Hall of Fame is indirectly referenced in the "See also" section, it has no prose dedicated to it. I found this article from the Chicago Sun-Times where Bob Nightengale explains why he voted for Hawkins.

Final comments and verdict

edit

What is here is good! Mostly some wikilinks to be added and some minor prose corrections. There are a few sections where I believe that the content could be expanded, particularly with regards to his later years, so I'm going to put the article   On hold until those sections are expanded upon. Feel free to reach out if you have any questions! Kncny11 (shoot) 02:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Especially impressed with how quickly you got that pitching style section up! I made one small typo change, and I think it's good to go! Kncny11 (shoot) 16:59, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply