This article was nominated for deletion on 13 May 2011. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Is it relevant to include information on the strong criticism La Carmina receives from her related subculture groups? I feel the article is incomplete and gives and innacurate picture without it. -- Pinkordead (talk) 16:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
If there is a notable level of criticism that can be cited to reliable sources, as per WP:BLPSTYLE I would say that should definitely be included. I don't personally have much idea of who the subject is, but the article as it is represents the subject as having universal praise and acclaim (and, frankly, struck me as being either self promotion or written by a fan). If that is not an accurate representation, then please do provide some alternate viewpoints. Ibanez100 (talk) 00:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
OK, having taken a quick look around, I did notice a lot of strong criticism from subculture groups. When I have time I might see if there's anything citable there - since this is a BLP we have to be extremely mindful of citations and avoid gossip. In the meantime I'm going to put a news release template on the article in hopes of encouraging others to help, since the article presents only the most favorable information about the subject and includes no alternate viewpoints. Ibanez100 (talk) 02:27, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
While notable criticism of a subject should certainly be included in a Wikipedia article, there does not seem to be anything in a WP:RS reliable source (at least that I can find) to indicate that this subject is controversial. I am reinstating the lead that was taken out (as it stands, it's not very descriptive of what the subject does/has created or why she is notable) but will leave out some of the superlatives such as CBC's Canada's Greatest Blogs mention. I believe this should resolve the neutrality dispute as per currently available resources, so I am taking down the flag.Feather Jonah II (talk) 08:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on La Carmina. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
.jpg){kind=small}