Talk:La Chaux-de-Fonds

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Gégène in topic Area display problem

City or town?

edit

In my opinion, it is clearly, by Swiss standards, a city, because of its size, regional centre political, economical and cultural importance.

claude (talk) 19:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

When writing about La Chaux-de-Fonds in English, in terms of its magnitude and prominence within the politico-demographic map of today's Switzerland, would it be more appropriate to describe it as a city (as on this page), or a town (as on the page of La Chaux-de-Fonds (district))? -- Thanks, Deborahjay 09:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

City or town?

edit

I guess the people how wrote the page for (as on this page) is not making the difference, because there is french spoken area and to aplicate english (esp. writing) we encounter dificulties.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.58.18.10 (talk) 07:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Gallet

edit

It seems that the company is trying to push some advertising through Wikipedia and the La Chaux-de-Fonds page. I moved all the mess to Léon Gallet for the history of the father and Gallet & Co. for the "history" of the company. Hope that the people who inserted the Gallet history understand that the La Chaux-de-Fonds page is not about the Gallet family, but the city who one's they inhabited (among thousands of other people). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fib2004 (talkcontribs) 16:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Apparently, they have moved back everything, as per today's peruse of the page! I share your opinion, but do not feel that it is up to me to act on my own. claude (talk) 19:23, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

World heritage site

edit

This article was not written in news style, and not in encyclopaedia style, but can some content, sources be merged into the article proper?

 
La Chaux-de-Fonds' planning: an open-ended scheme of parallel strips

It is unusual. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) awarded the world heritage status to two industrial cities from Switzerland. It is unusual because many see in this status the recognition of ancient beauty, rather than industrial dynamism. The towns of La Chaux-de-Fonds and Le Locle are accidental. Their history is based on a single industry, watch-making, which shaped their planning and architecture, in a region where, for climatic reasons, nothing else could have been done.

Watch-making began and developed there during the 17th and 18th century. During the long winters of the Jura mountains, at an altitude of about a 1000 meters, peasants began to create and build watches. In 1794, a great fire destructed La Chaux-de-Fonds. Autorities decided to carefully plan the rebuilding to accomodate the watch-making industry, which was already predominant at the time. For the next two centuries, the two cities florished along with their main industry.

According to the UNESCO, the cities are recognized because they present "outstanding examples of mono-industrial manufacturing-towns which are well preserved and still active." In Das Kapital, Karl Marx described La Chaux-de-Fonds as a "huge factory-town". And there was born and studied Le Corbusier, who left few buildings in the town, but was greatly inspired by its planning and architecture.

 
Villa Jeanneret-Perret, the first independent project by Le Corbusier, in La Chaux-de-Fonds

The world heritage comittee holds his 33rd meeting between the 22nd and 30th of June 2009 in Sevilla, Spain.

Original Editor: Fib2004 SriMesh | talk 05:56, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on La Chaux-de-Fonds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Chaux-de-Fonds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Chaux-de-Fonds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Area display problem

edit

I had my attention caught by the figure of 5,000+ km², which is total nonsense, and I had a look at the source code, which states the right figure of 55 km². I have no time right now to check how wiki code works in details, but there's a separator problem somewhere, so if seasoned user knows how to deals this out, thanks in advance. Gégène (talk) 13:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply