Talk:La Coupole/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Prioryman in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 02:10, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Books need place of publication. Fix capitalization for Zaloga 2003 and spelling for Mississauga.
    Done. Prioryman (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    Provide conversion for 6 ton.
    I'm not sure why it used that figure in the first place, I've changed it to the more conventional 12,000 lb (and the kg equivalent). Prioryman (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: