Talk:La Hague site

Untitled

I think radioactive waste from Germany is not sent to La Hague any more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.152.199.115 (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Hague site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130081307/http://areva-nc.fr/scripts/areva-nc/publigen/content/templates/Show.asp?P=7342&L=FR to http://www.areva-nc.fr/scripts/areva-nc/publigen/content/templates/Show.asp?P=7342&L=FR

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

POV

I'm not sure what the official procedure is for POV, but I think this article leans way to much to the Greenpeace POV. At no point is official data given for (for example) the real radioisotope emissions, compared to international limits. Also, it would be interesting to see what the plant actually does in chemical treatment, and how the fuel is actually reprocessed. Fsikkema (talk) 14:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Capacity

"La Hague has nearly half of the world's light water reactor spent nuclear fuel reprocessing capacity." Can this be true? A reactor may need 25 tons of nuclear fuel per year, so 400 reactors create about 10 000 tons of spent fuel each year. With a capacity of 1700 tonnes, this is not half of the world's (most reactors are light water reactors) nuclear waste. --Gunnar (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC) Dear GunnarKästle, the reprocessing capacity of the world is much smaller, than the annual spent fuel creation of the power reactors (which is indeed about 10 000 tonna per year). So it is indeed true, that Le Hauge represents about the half of the worlds reprocessing capacity.