This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the La Manga Club article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... the tags A7 and G11 are not applicable. I already removed them but someone is is edit-warring to keep them. A7 is inapplicable because an award for the place is claimed. G11 is inapplicable because the article says that the place is heavily in debt, which is not promotional content. Andrew D. (talk) 15:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- I did not say that the sentence the place is heavily in debt (unsourced defamatory claim) was promotional. » Shadowowl | talk 15:09, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- WP:G11 "applies to pages that are exclusively promotional". Note the word "exclusively". Andrew D. (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
- Andrew, while I agree that G11 doesn't apply, you too are misinterpreting it by emphasizing "exclusively" as though that were relevant here. That word is meant to exclude pages that are only "mostly" promotional, and has nothing to do with "applying exclusively to promotional pages". Yes, it does apply exclusively to promotional pages, but that's not what you said, and when you make mistakes like the above, policy obliges us to assume that you are not trying to game the system and are legitimately mistaken, and reverting someone who seems to have made a good-faith error is not "edit-warring". Additionally, that content is clearly inappropriate and needs to go anyway, regardless of whether you interpret it as a promotional plea for donations or as an attack on the club. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:00, 18 September 2018 (UTC)