Talk:La Nube/GA1

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Sammi Brie in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 22:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Solid and needing just some general polish. One question about a reference. Ping when done.

@Sammi Brie: Thanks for taking the time to review! Responded to everything below. Bsoyka (tcg) 04:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Copy changes

edit

Lead

edit
  • The lead (once I reverted the puffery someone added) is rather short. One or two more sentences about featured exhibits, minimum, would really help.
    Added a sentence—let me know if more might be better. Bsoyka (tcg) 04:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

History

edit
  • maybe "El Paso Fire Department (EPFD)'s" instead of "El Paso Fire Department's (EPFD)"???
    I actually don't love either option, so I switched to "the response of the El Paso Fire Department (EPFD)" to avoid the acronym/possessive weirdness altogether. Bsoyka (tcg) 04:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing and spot checks

edit
  • 3: When the city pitched a children’s museum idea to voters in 2012, it estimated the $19 million price tag would mostly be used to build the facility and program some exhibits.  Y
  • 6: The proposed El Paso Children's Museum received a $20 million boost from the city to ensure it offers a "world-class" educational experience, but at least one city representative believes even that won't be enough. The $20 million the city voted to issue in debt through certificate of obligation bonds combined with about $20 million in additional funding from a nonprofit partner, EPC Museum, boosts the total project budget to about $60 million. Voters approved $19.5 million in funding for the Children's Museum in 2012, as part of a $473 million quality of life bond package. The Children's Museum was one of three "signature" projects. The other two were a multipurpose arena and a Hispanic Cultural Center. I don't think this goes to "This decision faced some criticism from the community", but it checks out the rest.  Y
    Sorry for my confusion, not sure I understand the issue here. "This decision faced some criticism from the community" isn't cited to ref 6 but rather to ref 10, which definitely covers community criticism. Bsoyka (tcg) 04:44, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  • 12: The team proposed a vaulted museum lifted of the ground, a design made to preserve public space and an interactive garden below.  Y
  • 16: Quote checks out.  Y
  • 20: The name of the new museum was chosen from a long list of more than 600 submissions by El Pasoans, and it was announced at a ceremony at Aoy Elementary School.  Y
  • 22: La Nube will open in early 2023.  Y

Earwig mostly catches one long quote. but nothing else.

Images

edit

The image is CC-BY-SA 4.0 licensed and permissible under the very limited scope of architectural copyright. The logo is appropriate fair use with NFUR.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.