Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Keavila.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled

edit

I've left the foll text in the article but it doesn't seem right. Should "river" be replaced by "estuary" perhaps?

"Although some members of the species do spend portions of their live outside of river systems, there are many individuals who live their entire lives within rivers, never venturing into the ocean proper." Nurg 09:00, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Confusing

edit

"lives in the ocean and saltwater estuaries" -> Does that mean the ocean + saltwater estuaries, or ocean estuaries + saltwater saltwater? A layperson wouldn't know. Xiner 21:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:CETA capitalisation discussion

edit

Add a Section?

edit

Should there be a food and foraging section? I'd like to get opinions on doing that before I add it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikieditor2258 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

2016 CNN Article Claim Refuted

edit

metro.co.uk/2016/02/19/apparently-that-dolphin-wasnt-killed-by-tourists-taking-selfies-5705566/

Perhaps the CNN story citation should be removed? Or, just accompanied by this additional refutation. --184.248.15.101 (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Huh. I commented it out for the time being, let's see which version comes out on top. I don't think the story is important enough to present it + the refutation, if there's any doubt about veracity.-- Elmidae (talk) 15:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add Section

edit

It would be helpful to add a section discussing the evolutionary history of this animal. Who is its ancestors and when did it diverge from these ancestors? There are so many other species of river dolphins; thus, outlining the evolutionary tree would be useful for readers.

Bfiorenzo (talk) 16:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply


I think that the first paragraph under the section labeled, Conservation, needs to have a source cited within or at the end of that paragraph. Knmercy13 (talk) 23:44, 9 December 2016 (UTC) bberry5Reply

Range and Habitat

edit

There is no source cited for this section. I have added a [citation needed] note in the actual article.

Bfiorenzo (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Plata dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Plata dolphin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:55, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Buzzfeed Source concern

edit

I noticed there's an image source for buzzfeed in this article. However, it is not used anywhere in the article. Is the source even necessary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmfarmer (talkcontribs) 22:54, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply