Talk:Labia stretching

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labia stretching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070907172853/http://mwenyamukuka.blog.com/2053397/ to http://mwenyamukuka.blog.com/2053397/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=59304&nfid=rssfeeds

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

resources

Guillermo Martínez Pérez, Concepción Tomás Aznar & Brigitte Bagnol (2013) Labia Minora Elongation and its Implications on the Health of Women: A Systematic Review, International Journal of Sexual Health, 26:3, 155-171, DOI: 10.1080/19317611.2013.851139 Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Another: [Polynesian Resource Center http://polynesianresourcecenter.com/culture/item/polynesian-sexual-customs] Carbon Caryatid (talk) 17:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

this is still considered FGM currently.

This article seems to downplay that this is painful for victims. It also may be that it is still considered FGM by the WHO under type 4. A scientific paper: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9984772/ A survivor's account: https://sahiyo.com/2020/02/06/survivor-why-labia-elongation-is-female-genital-mutilation/ 2600:1008:B054:5E73:FDAA:5A38:6145:5E69 (talk) 05:27, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

HIV rates

This article says elongation reduces HIV rates, but the source it cites says it in fact hinders HIV *prevention* 2601:645:8700:FC0:9D:7BEA:D9B6:5050 (talk) 06:39, 8 September 2024 (UTC)