Talk:Lach
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 February 2013. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
editIf sources aren't cited in the very near future _and_ this gets rewritten in style that mimics his press release, is this article suitable for deletion? I'm not even questioning notability, simply that we don't need adverts on Wikipedia, we need articles. Anyone going to step into the breach before I flag it? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I feel like it's unfair to allow a musician who has released an album on some obscure record label a page but not allow one to any regular joe who can play guitar or drums or anything. Wikipedia should be reserved for USEFUL information only, not some random asshole's ego-trip. If you want to make an encyclopedia of musicians, make your own wiki.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strachkvas (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)