Talk:Lachine massacre/Archive 1

Archive 1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written:

   Not Yet

   1. The Introduction needs to be expanded significantly so that it adequately summarizes the entire article in a few paragraphs.
   2. An infobox would be helpful at the top of the article as well to help summarize some of the major details.
   3. Many editors frown on one-sentence paragraphs. I would suggest merging the sentencens that stand alone into existing paragraphs or into paragraphs of their own (such as in the "historical accounts" section.
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable:

   Pass the article is sufficently sourced.

3. It is broad in its coverage:

   Pass no problems there.

   1. One nitpick though, the source for the book quote should be placed directly after the quote itself, instead of after the name of the book that it comes from.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:

   Pass no problems there.

5. It is stable:

   Not Yet Solving the above issues will make the article stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate:

   Pass no problems there.

7. Overall:

   On Hold just a few things need to be done to get the article a promotion. -Ed! (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Response to GA review

1. It is reasonably well written:
   1. The Introduction has been expanded to summarize the article's overall contents.
   2. An infobox has been added.
   3. One-sentence paragraphs have been consolidated.
2. It is broad in its coverage:
   1. Source for book quotation has been moved to end of the quotation.

AlphaEta 19:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok, that looks good. Well done! -Ed! (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Fort Lachine.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Fort Lachine.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Other speedy deletions What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:32, 12 January 2012 (UTC)