Talk:Ladoga Canal
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help! |
A fact from Ladoga Canal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 22, 2012. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Насколько корректно переводить названия георграфических объектов дословно? и если так правильней (не могу найти карту с англоязычными названиями), то почему вы не исправили названия в самой статье, а только в названии и фотографиях?--FearChild 10:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Compare this and this. As per WP:NC, we use the most common name in English. By the way, if you list some references, I will nominate this entry for DYK. Best, Ghirla-трёп- 10:37, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Now I see, thanks. So, I will change all "Ladozhsky Canal", "Staroladozhsky Canal", "Novoladoghskiy Canal" to Ladoga Canal, Old Ladoga Canal and New Ladoga Canal, right? Or this differences of names in article is acceptable? P.S what kind of references? Sources In English?--FearChild 10:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Anything where you found the information contained in the article. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Now I see, thanks. So, I will change all "Ladozhsky Canal", "Staroladozhsky Canal", "Novoladoghskiy Canal" to Ladoga Canal, Old Ladoga Canal and New Ladoga Canal, right? Or this differences of names in article is acceptable? P.S what kind of references? Sources In English?--FearChild 10:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
"the canals were neglected"
editI am afraid that specifically for the canals this is not the case. They were neglected as new types of vessels were able to cope Ladoga waves and were too large for the canal. Volga-Baltic waterway is still very important, and, as far as I know, more efficient than the railways. Colchicum 12:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Any reader of transport history will say this neglect is obvious. After 1860 the rise of rail networks obliterated the canal technology on speed, and volume of goods. It happened in the UK and the US. It is not dubious but fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.68.6.12 (talk) 16:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Muennich
editI would like to argue here that not Skornyakov-Pisarev and his German experts were arrested, but that only Skornyakov-Pisarev was... The German engineer count von Münnich took over the management of the building site up to successful completion of the canal. He was the German expert and lockkeeper who built definitively the canal - against all intrigues of Menshikov (a friend of Skornyakov-Pisarev). 84.185.102.130 17:57, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ladoga Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819224922/https://www.clubneva.ru/lib.htm to http://www.clubneva.ru/lib.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ladoga Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060905173110/http://enspire.syr.edu/NevaProject/site4/shlisshist.html to http://enspire.syr.edu/nevaproject/site4/shlisshist.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20021120054228/http://ktmz.boom.ru/library/wwte/len47/south/volhov.html to http://ktmz.boom.ru/library/wwte/len47/south/volhov.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829004713/http://library.riverships.ru/Books/River/13.htm to http://library.riverships.ru/Books/River/13.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090325192502/http://www.clubneva.ru/lib/ladoga3.jpg to http://www.clubneva.ru/lib/ladoga3.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 15 December 2017 (UTC)