Talk:Lady Eleanor Smith

Latest comment: 4 years ago by BegbertBiggs in topic Requested move 30 September 2020

Ancestry

edit

What source puts the article in the "British people of Romani descent" category? Seems a conjectural connection that may have instead been "traveller" (i.e. "Irish Traveller") and not related to the Romani people. Are there any sources? Thanks PGPaulson 21:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PGPaulson (talkcontribs)

Requested move 25 June 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. I'm working on the disambiguation. wbm1058 (talk) 03:51, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


Eleanor SmithEleanor Smith (writer) – No primary topic. The politician challenges her now. Unreal7 (talk) 21:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

When Station1 are you going to read the Primary Topic guideline? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
It's fairly straightforward. When one topic consistently gets a significant majority of pageviews over other topics that share the same name, as here, that is objective evidence that it is the primary topic for Wikipedia's purposes. By putting that topic at the base name, with appropriate hatnotes, we make it slightly easier for some searchers to navigate to the topic they are looking for. Substituting editors' subjective judgment as to what they think should be the primary topic should be done only in rare cases. If we make Eleanor Smith a dab page, no one looking for the politician is any better off than they are now, and in fact a very small number looking for the writer would worse off. Station1 (talk) 17:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 30 September 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 11:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply



Eleanor Smith (writer)Lady Eleanor SmithWP:COMMONNAME: as an author she was known as Lady Eleanor Smith, not Eleanor Smith. WP:TITLESINTITLES applies to styles like "The Right Honourable" and not to titles like Lord and Lady; see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility)#British nobility paragraph 5. Opera hat (talk) 16:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

a) Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Biography#Honorific titles is not a relevant guideline as it governs the content of articles, not article titles.
b) Even if it were relevant, it specifically notes titles like Lord and Lady as exceptions which should be included. Opera hat (talk) 09:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.