Talk:Lady Pank
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
edit"Lady Pank live shows are considered perfect. The experts say the quality of sound is no worse than that achieved in the studio. In 1983 alone, the group performed 369 times. After another three years the amount of live acts performed by the group grew up to over 800. That's a record on the Polish scene"
citation? -A.R. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.58.10.252 (talk • contribs) .
The entire article is biased. Examples of POV: "group's unquestionnable talent", "The recording history of Lady Pank is impressive", "Lady Pank has always used the highest quality instruments" etc. Jogers (talk) 17:29, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
This article is not biased. Basically it is shortened version of what's on the band's official website.
Norum 08.07.2006
Well, then there you go. Since the info is from the Groups OWN website this proves the bias !
Possible copyright problem
editThis article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:38, 30 January 2015 (UTC)