Talk:Lagentium
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lagentium article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
editArticle reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
historical inaccuracies
editBrigantines were not very peaceful. The current term "Brigand" comes from them.
Rome did not withdraw her legions permanently in AD 180. Constantine the Great was crowned in York a century after that! Castlesteads in the Hadrian's wall was occupied probably for a century or more after Constantine's coronation.
Romano-British is not the culture of just the Brigantines and the Romans. It was found throughout the British provinces that had been under the Roman rule and probably the other Celtic cultures contributed to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.65.69.129 (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lagentium/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 00:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lagentium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514111209/http://www.roman-britain.org/places/lagentium.htm to http://www.roman-britain.org/places/lagentium.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lagentium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110415043604/http://www.twixtaireandcalder.org.uk/FAQs/default.htm to http://www.twixtaireandcalder.org.uk/FAQs/default.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Lagentium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311085459/http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/the_excavations.php to http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/the_excavations.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110310051652/http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/index.php to http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/index.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110311085405/http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/after.php to http://www.wakefieldmuseums.org/roman_castleford/after.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 15 December 2017 (UTC)