Talk:Lake Hayward (Wisconsin)

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake Hayward (Wisconsin) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hangon rationale:

First, notablility is a non-issue. There's a lot of consensus that named geographic places are notable.

Second, has the nominator done a good faith search to determine that this cannot be expanded at all? Real life interrupted my work on this, but I seriously doubt that a lake in Wisconsin cannot expand beyond a stub. (And sheesh, give me more than two minutes to expand the thing.)--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Refactoring my comment, now that I've had a chance to calm down a bit. Sorry for the outburst, but thanks for the reminder of how new editors feel when an article gets a speedy tag.

"Unlikely to expand" is not a valid CSD reason. At the time of tagging there was content and context, and it was a perfectly valid stub. It told the reader exactly what and where the subject was, and even gave a coordinate so the reader could look it up on a map. If the article never expanded beyond that, it would still be a valid article, meeting both WP:N and WP:V.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I added a citation to this article. If the nominator had look at the citation and seen the map that the lake is located within Hayward, Wisconsin.Thank you-RFD (talk) 23:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Hayward (Wisconsin). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220150347/http://www.wisconsinslakes.com/sawyer_county_lakes.html to http://www.wisconsinslakes.com/sawyer_county_lakes.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic