Talk:Lake Jackson Mounds Archaeological State Park

Florida Low‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More stuff for inclusion

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Parkwells, your work came up on my watchlist, so thought I'd throw out a few suggestions. Here is a list page of other mississippian sites and a template for precolumbian NA. Didn't want to cause edit conflicts or step on your toes.

List of Mississippian sites, for a See also section, a list of similar sites.

Anyway, happy editing. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Date style-Common Era or ANNO DOMINI

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article was originally in the BC/AD date style, but at some point over a year ago during an expansion it was changed to the more scholarly and neutral BCE/CE. A one edit IP recently reverted it to the BC/AD, citing WP:ERA. So as not to start an edit war by simply reverting, and per WP:ERA where it states "Do not change from one style to another unless there is substantial reason for the change, and consensus for the change with other editors", I was wondering if there is consensus amongst the people who edit this page to keep it BCE/CE? It has been stable for over a year as CE, is more neutral when describing a non-Christian site and society, and CE is a common and accepted date style among archaeologists, especially for non western and non christian societies. I would welcome some input. I've also left a message at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Archaeology#Common era or AD about this discussion.

Support use of Common era, as the proposer. He iro 03:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
Comment: WP:ERA also states "Do not use CE or AD unless the date would be ambiguous without it" - since there are no BC/E dates in the article, following that guideline seems like a good compromise (which, as it happens, was the original usage in the article). The one place I can see it being a problem is this section:

He used radio-carbon dating of wood and charcoal excavated from the bottom and the top of the mound to determine dates of 760 years and 475 years Before Present (based on 1950 as present) for its span of construction. This means approximately AD 1190 to AD 1475.

But it seems to me there's an unnecessary amount of verbiage there anyway, so it can be reworded to avoid the ambiguity:

Radiocarbon dating of wood and charcoal excavated from the top and bottom of the mound indicate it was constructed between c. 1190 and 1475.

—Joseph Roe^Tk•Cb, 09:16, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The part of WP:ERA that's relevant here is "Do not use CE or AD unless the date would be ambiguous without it (e.g. "The Norman Conquest took place in 1066" not 1066 CE or AD 1066)". The dates are not ambiguous without either AD/CE so the point is moot and I've removed instances of either AD/CE from the article. Nev1 (talk) 18:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lake Jackson Mounds Archaeological State Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130403084151/http://www.trailoffloridasindianheritage.org/pdf/fw1.pdf to http://www.trailoffloridasindianheritage.org/pdf/fw1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic