Talk:Lake Johnston (Western Australia)

Australia: Western Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lake Johnston (Western Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake Johnston (Western Australia) is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

lake location due to low rain

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The statement that "Due to low rainfall, the lake lies to the east of the agricultural region of the south west part of Western Australia" probably needs rewording. One might claim of almost any lake that its location is due to rainfall or lack thereof in the area. Some explanation of the correlation between the low rainfall and the location (in particular, relative to the agricultural region) would be helpful. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

It is in a remote location outside of agricultural area. I'll get around to re-writing when i find the right ref for that JarrahTree 13:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic