This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Draft discussion
edit- Comment: Without any citations to reliable sources, this cannot form part of the encylopedia. One would probably be sufficient here. LukeSurl t c 16:54, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Approved. --Gryllida (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Passes inclusion criteria; I am providing more details below as to what future work I would encourage.
- Copyright: Pass.
- Article layout and focus: Great focus and structure.
- Notability and references: Inline citations are insufficient, making it impossible to verify much of article content. You have to use them as described here.
- NPOV / Neutral&encyclopedic phrasing: Pass.
- Style and formatting: External links are unreadable, please convert to inline citations or add title.
Perhaps try to perform these steps:
- Convert external links to inline citations or add title.
- Gather references, if necessary, to verify each point and expand the article.