Talk:Lakewood Township, New Jersey

Opening heading

It's incredible that this article mentions demographics but fails to mention the significant Hasidic community in Lakewood. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.105.90 (talk) 03:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

i think it's awfully strange that lakewood's demographics are practically the same as that of the united states. hmmmmmmm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nmcastorsilva (talk • contribs) 07:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: History For a profound information please look at History of Lakewood. Greetings from Germany!!!--178.11.235.191 (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

It's incredible that this article makes no mention of the measles outbreak in Ocean County that's centered in Lakewood: https://www.state.nj.us/health/cd/documents/topics/measles/ocean_county_locations.pdf

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lakewood Township, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://geonames.usgs.gov/fips55/NJfips55_delim.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lakewood Township, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110221020910/http://2010.census.gov/news/xls/st34-final_newjersey.xls to http://2010.census.gov/news/xls/st34-final_newjersey.xls
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.state.nj.us/njbusiness/financing/tax/geographic.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160814022353/http://www.lwvnj.org/images/CG/2016_CG.pdf to http://www.lwvnj.org/images/CG/2016_CG.pdf
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.app.com/story/news/local/2014/12/02/two-shore-catholic-schools-close/19798133/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Lakewood Township, New Jersey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.juf.org/news_public_affairs/article.asp?key=7215
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150309101226/http://strand.org/history.aspx to http://www.strand.org/history.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111223212738/http://www.georgian.edu/arboretum/index.htm to http://www.georgian.edu/arboretum/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605034459/http://censtats.census.gov/data/NJ/0603402938550.pdf to http://censtats.census.gov/data/NJ/0603402938550.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110828165726/http://www.georgian.edu/aboutgcu/index.htm to http://www.georgian.edu/aboutgcu/index.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725132311/http://www.calvaryacademy.org/academy_page.aspx?id=458692 to http://www.calvaryacademy.org/academy_page.aspx?id=458692
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080914173139/http://www.ocean.nj.us/parks/ocp.html to http://www.ocean.nj.us/parks/ocp.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713005225/http://movies.ign.com/articles/432/432051p1.html to http://movies.ign.com/articles/432/432051p1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713104148/http://www.jewishpress.com/pageroute.do/44951/ to http://www.jewishpress.com/pageroute.do/44951/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

"Orthodox" vs Jewish

@Alansohn: In this edit, you substituted "Jewish" for "Orthodox". The cited source is very specific in referring to the proportion of Orthodox Jews in the town, rather than simply the proportion of Jews in the town (which can include non-Orthodox Jews, such as Reform Jews and Conservative Jews]]). A March 2020 NPR report, citing the NJ.com report, puts the number of Orthodox Jews as approaching 70%.

I'm not sure that we can affirmatively state the increase of Jews (of all denominations) by using the 2018 report either. The Berman Jewish DataBank source appears to discuss Jews of all sects, rather than just Orthodox Jews. As a result, I don't think the simple math exception to WP:NOR applies here. What is the rationale behind the contextualization that is currently in the article? — Mhawk10 (talk) 17:47, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

• Mhawk10, the issues you raise are legitimate. The Berman Jewish DataBank lists the number of Jews as of 2009, not the percentage, and lists them as Jews with no breakdown by Reform / Conservative / Orthodox. The 2018 article does refer specifically to Orthodox Jews as being 2/3 of the population, which could mean that there could be some percentage of Reform / Conservative Jews to be added in, but it doesn't provide a population for the Orthodox community. The 2020 NPR article does say 70%, which is in line with the 2/3 in the 2018 NJ.com article. Even if the 58,500 cited by the Berman study includes Jews of all varieties, the 2/3 (or 70%) would put the Orthodox community alone at 90,000. That growth from 58,500 (of all Jews) in 2009 to 90,000 (of Orthodox) in 2018/2020 is worthy of mention and the numbers were calculated based on percentages of the total population in the years in question and that's why I thought it important to include the Berman data from a decade before. Alansohn (talk) 18:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

  I agree that it makes sense to include the Berman data, since it helps to state the sheer size of the expansion. I just take a slight issue with the calculation of an increase of at least 35,000 in the previous decade, since the Orthodox Jewish growth is (almost) certainly greater than "Orthodox Jews in 2018" - "All Jews in 2010". — Mhawk10 (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Interactive map is wrong

The interactive map doesn't include the CDP of Lakewood, which is a part of the township. Minilammas (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)