Talk:Lam Dorji

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lam Dorji. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140223115014/http://www.kuenselonline.com/his-majesty-the-king-awards-decoration-medals/ to http://www.kuenselonline.com/his-majesty-the-king-awards-decoration-medals/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 26 August 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. No consensus, to enable a future RM to look at this again if needed, as many responses have noted that it's too soon to decide on a primary topic, due to the recency of the Olympic event that has affected the pageviews for Lam Dorji (archer).

Lam Dorji (general) was noted as a viable alternative, but there does not appear to be a consensus to move the article, especially given the argument that the general may be the primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) ASUKITE 14:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

---

Lam Dorji → Lam Dorji (military personnel) – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 23:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.  ASUKITE 14:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

• Support the archer has 245 views compared with only 148[[1]] for the military personnel. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
• SUpport, create DAB at basename.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose. Clear primary topic by long-term significance over the brief article on the archer. Of course he has more views - he's just competed in the Olympics (in which he came 28th!)! Pure WP:RECENTISM. But otherwise, it should be Lam Dorji (general). I can't believe that nobody above has noticed the bizarre proposed disambiguator! "Personnel" is plural and we never use this sort of thing as a disambiguator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose, too soon. Page view analysis shows that any notability from Lam Dorji (archer) would most likely be a result of the 2024 Summer Olympics. A hat note disambiguator will suffice, at least until we can show sustained interest such that the nominators "no clear PRIMARYTOPIC" argument stands. Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Military history and WikiProject Bhutan have been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 14:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose as proposed, no objection to Lam Dorji (general). 162 etc. (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose Too soon - WP:RECENTISM. If necessary, Lam Dorji (general) would be heaps better. Cinderella157 (talk) 02:52, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.