Talk:Lam Qua

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 64.121.39.222 in topic Romanisation

Images needed

edit

There are a number of online sources for the portraits, are there any on Wikipedia? Public domain? 209.178.168.182 06:07, 2 November 2005 (UTC) (trouble logging in again, Joaquin)Reply

Romanisation

edit

Please make sure that all names are romanised appropiately. Especially the article's title made me frown: Lam Qua is hardly an acceptable transcription. The two characters 林官 should be Lam Gun in Yale transcription as well as in Wong Sik-Ling transcription. Tin Qua (庭官) ist likewise problematic.

And "Qua" is being used as a redirect even though it is a surname in Ulster. I am not sure that this painter is important enough to be known by his last name no matter how it is romanized. Either way it sounds like the redirection should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.162.122 (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

The correct romanization of the artist's name should for sure be in the article, but the title is correct. Lam Qua achieved fame in the nineteenth century as "Lam Qua," regardless of romanization rules since the early nineteenth century.

As for "Qua," definitely should not be a redirect, as "Qua" is not his surname. As with most Chinese names, "Lam" (Lin) is his surname. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.121.39.222 (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Misattributed photograph

edit

I don't think that the photograph on this page, taken by John Thomson, depicts Lam Qua. The same photograph is on Thomson's page and is captioned as "A painter at work. John Thomson. Honk Kong, 1871.", additionally Lam Qua died in 1860, before John Thomson started photographing in Hong Kong. The file description of the photo on this page, taken from the book the photo was published in, probably didn't intend to claim this was Lam Qua, but another one of the painters working in Hong Kong at the time, as the majority of the text describes the profession in general. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.241.60.105 (talk) 22:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lam Qua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)Reply