This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI dislike non-notable bios as much as everybody else. However:
- 1) He's a Navy quarterback
- 2) He's involved in a rape case that's been covered by the national media for over a year. Here is just a sampling of articles that a Google search will turn up:
- CBS News (2006/02/22)
- ESPN (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2359619 2006/03/08)
- MSNBC (2006/04/28)
- hometownannapolis.com (2006/07/15)
- Washington Post (2006/12/16)
- Washington Post (2007/01/18)
A couple of these links were included in the original article. When sources are provided one should not be so quick to slap a db tag on an article. - Big Brother 1984 18:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Expulsion
editNew news. He's getting expelled. Article needs to be updated accordingly. --72.200.65.39 15:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Baltimore Sun article, same topic http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.owens13apr13,0,3165353.story?coll=bal-local-headlines
==
Isn't it bad form to name a sexual assault complainant? Even if the accused is prosecuted and found not guilty? As long as the complainant isn't found guilty of perjury? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.179.66.205 (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks to whoever cleaned up on this point. Drama Lady (talk) 03:08, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it is bad, and those updates have now been oversighted. Folks - please don't do that again by mentioning the alleged victim. There's no reliable source for her name, and for good reason - Alison ❤ 04:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
==Update