Talk:Lambeau Field

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Gangster Octopus in topic Untitled

Untitled

edit

Does ANybody have information on the RIng of Honor? Has been there since the stadium opened? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gangster Octopus (talkcontribs) 18:17, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why the heck is Lambeau Leap redirected to Lambeau Field? They are pretty much unrelated.--Aviper2k7 05:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lambeau Leap was subject to a deletion debate here, of which redirection was the outcome. HollyAm 06:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for clearing that up, it was bugging me--Aviper2k7 06:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article claims that the Ice Bowl was the coldest game in NFL history.....as does the Freezer Bowl section of Cincinnati Bengals article.....This should probably be addressed....

The Freezer Bowl was "the coldest temperature in NFL history in terms of wind chill." The Ice Bowl, on the other hand, was coldest in terms of air temperature. Since the Freezer Bowl article makes that distinction, all references to the Ice Bowl should note that it was the coldest in terms of ambient (i.e. "air") temp.
Game Air Temp. Wind Chill
Freezer Bowl -9°F -59°F
Ice Bowl -13°F -48°F
-JakeApple 23:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
In Jeff Dunham: Spark of Insanity Jeff and his puppet Walter joke about Lambeau Field:
Walter: And another thing--Green Bay Packers' stadium... what's it called again?
Jeff: Lambeau Field.
Walter: Lambeau Field--no roof! Hello! How many weekends during football season is good weather in Green Bay? That would be... none. Note to self: Build a fricking roof! We have the technology!

--D-Boy Wheeler —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.223.40.99 (talk) 18:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Graph

edit

I think it would be interesting to include a line graph comparing the seating capacity of the Packer's stadiums, with the total population of Green Bay, Wis., at various times. Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 02:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Playing surface?

edit

I think listing the playing surface as "Grassmaster" in the Infobox is misleading. Grassmaster is not a traditional artificial turf - it is a series of artificial fibers reinforcing natural grass. On a Grassmaster field, artificial fibers constitute 3% of the surface, and the company itself considers the resulting surface to still be natural grass[1]. In the case of Lambeau Field, the playing surface is actually Kentucky bluegrass[2] I hope this revision makes it more clear. SixFourThree (talk) 20:03, 25 January 2011 (UTC)SixFourThreeReply

Frozen Tundra

edit

Hi, someone either copy and pasted a section from here to the 1967 NFL Championship Game, or vice versa. I changed the grammar around in the Ice Bowl article and put it down in the errata section under the Legacy section.

Can someone please advise if Lambeau Field is nicknamed, The Frozen Tundra or the Frozen Tundra so I can go back over there and fix that article. I have access to 10 books or so that surround the Ice Bowl and after I update the article with all the relevant facts about the heating system employed in 1967 at Lambeau Field, I will then return and put in some inline citations here.

I do not even think that stuff belongs in the Ice Bowl article, maybe just one line like ...lambeau field got its moniker from the ice bowl game. 66.234.33.8 (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, the term tundra apparently was first associated with the Sports Illustrated article by the immortal Tex Maule when describing the Ice Bowl game. (I think it is the very last word in the article) 66.234.33.8 (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

No one has shown a source, or notable source, that claims Lambeau field was alleged to have gotten its nickname from The Greatest Challenge173.52.5.48 (talk) 00:39, 5 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

My bad, Steve Sabol, in Davis' book on Rozelle, implies that people attributed the frozen tundra to John Facenda in The Greatest Challenge on p. 159. I removed citation needed and cited it accordingly. 173.52.5.48 (talk) 23:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lambeau Leap

edit

There seems to be a disproportionate amount of this section dedicated to describing opponents doing the Lambeau Leap. I'm not entirely sure why these moments of novelty are worth mentioning in the number that they are. Perhaps a slight rewrite is warrented that focuses at least equal space to notable Packer leaps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Levnclf (talkcontribs) 23:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Lambeau Field Logo.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Lambeau Field Logo.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Holiday Events

edit

I was thinking about possibly adding "Holiday Events" to the article. The following information I have gathered is:

A Halloween celebration, “Spooktacular Fun,” that includes live music, food, and performances from the like of magicians, clowns, and jugglers. [1]

A December themed occasion, Festival of Lights, that highlights a visit from Santa Claus, decorating cookies, choirs signing, and many festive lights. [2]

“Project Play 60” is a day in March that concentrates on getting kids out of the house to appreciate non-strenuous physical movement. More than 20,000 people attend the Atrium and enjoy activities. </ref>http://www.packers.com/news-and-events/article-press-release/article-1/Project-Play-60-set-for-March-4-in-Lambeau-Field-Atrium/93ed658c-7890-4027-a529-4735b1783311</ref>


Should I go about adding this information? If so, where should I add it in the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmparr (talkcontribs) 16:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


Jmparr (talk) 16:16, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

It's an encyclopedia article, not a fansite. Those don't seem encyclopedic. Do you think Britannica would include them? 32.218.42.24 (talk) 16:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lambeau Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lambeau Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply