Talk:Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:23, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, in accordance with MoS for science articles. Although I have limited knowledge of medicine and biochemistry, I could follow the article.

   IVIG (end of treatment section)needed explanation, I added a wikilink and the acronym.[2] I also consolidated some stray sentences.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear fine, RS, no OR. I assume good faith for sources which I cannot access.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Appears to cover the subject well.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned and tagged correctly

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, this is good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:53, 23 March 2011 (UTC)