This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
No need for two articles. Nice to see another Basque editor by the way but could you please be a little more encyclopaedic and less flowery? :) Akerbeltz (talk) 10:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
This article mainly describes beliefs about lamiak from the perspective of one who holds those beliefs. It would be more appropriate to describe the factual content of the beliefs (i.e. that these beliefs exist, and that some people hold or held them), rather than stating the substance of the beliefs as fact. For example: something like "Lamiak have duck feet" is not encyclopedic, and should be replaced with something like "Lamiak are described as having duck feet". It would be nice if someone could go through the article and rephrase everything in this way. Sources would be nice too! I might do this myself later but I'd have to do a little background research first since I am unfamiliar with the topic. 72.195.132.12 (talk) 22:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
