Talk:Lamia Al-Gailani Werr/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ingenuity (talk · contribs) 20:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

I can review this. Please ping me once you're done. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 20:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Prose

• studied at the University of Baghdad for year should be "a year" or "one year"

References

1. Add archive url, add link to Richard Sandomir
2. Add archive url
3. Add archive url
4. See #5, as they both have the same content and can be merged into one reference
5. This can be switched to the AP article, which is the original source
6. Looks good
7. Looks good
8. Add archive url
9. Dead link. Unfortunately, this doesn't appear to be available at the Internet Archive (or any other archive that I know of) so it should be removed
10. Appears to fail WP:SPS. I did manage to find the article this blog post was about, though, see here.
11. Dead link, though it is available at the Wayback machine. The author is Eve Conant, so that can be added to the reference
12. Add author, date, and archive url
13. This ref has weird parameters; it is currently |last=Maruf|first=Kanishk Tharoor and Maryam, though it should be |last1=Maruf |first1=Maryam |last2=Tharoor |first2=Kaniskh. Add archive url and website name.
14. Add author, date, and archive url

GA criteria

• Well-written:
• Verifiable: I've spot checked all of the sources, looks good
• Broad in its coverage:
• Neutral:
• Stable: hasn't even had a single vandal!
• Illustrated: there's only one image, but it is CC BY-SA and relevant.
• No copyright violations I have detected.

Thanks for the review Ingenuity, especially the close attention to reference formatting. I've incorporated all your suggestions and corrections apart from adding archive URLs, since in my experience there's usually bots that handle that, and as far as I know it's not a hard requirement for GA. – Joe (talk) 12:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Looks good, promoting now. Great work on this, @Joe Roe. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.