Talk:Lance (comic strip)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Low importance?

edit

I strongly object to "Lance" being rated "low importance". For example, to quote comics historian Bill Blackbeard "Lance" was "the best of the page-high adventure strips undertaken after the 1930s". Rick Norwood (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It is nearly forgotten, and is "the best" of a very small group. Still, I'm not an expert on these strips, and my ratings are often provisionally, i.e. until someone more qualified comes along and corrects them. So in general, feel free to change all my ratings, if I ever seriously disagree I'll start a discussion. The important part of my edits was the addition to the comics project, not so much the actual rating. Fram (talk) 14:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lance (comic strip). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)Reply