Talk:Lance C. Wade

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Baclightning in topic http://www.billybishop.net/wade.html

Untitled

edit

Hipocrite, I MOSTLY liked the way you edited this article. But the part you dropped, my friend considered significant. You'd have to ask him why. But that was the way he gave me the info on Lance Wade. Otherwise, I have no problem with the rest of your edit.

Thanks,Al Lowe

  • I have no problem with the age being in, but I couldn't figure out a good sentence structure. However, sitting on it for a few hours, and I got it - It was hard for me to keep "untimely" out of it, but I did so. Hipocrite 19:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

That looks just fine. I have no problem with it at all. Thanks.Al Lowe

http://www.billybishop.net/wade.html

edit

Info in the article republished with permission, according to a message I removed from the article. --Tagishsimon (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

The first time, shortly after I put this article in Wikipedia, I didn't have a link to my original page on Wade, and it got taken down temporarily for possible copyright problems. With the link there, it should cut down on these problems...I hope. Besides, the more people fiddle with this article, the more it will look different from the original web page.Al Lowe 00:36, 27 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

  • In retrospect, since the external link IS mentioned here, there should not be any more problems concerning copyrights and such. And I have modified the copyright notice on the web page, I removed the "all rights reserved" part, so that should make a difference as well.Al Lowe 18:01, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I updated the link for the 2005 Bill passed by the Texas legislature honoring Wade. Baclightning 10:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply