Talk:Land Transport Authority

Cleaned up the content

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I removed most of the article because it simply seems like it was written by a disgruntled driver in Singapore. Calling the LTA a 'government-designated monopoly' doesn't show much objectivity on the part of Huaiwei. For example, on the ERP, the article stated, "This is what the LTA does to try and solve the traffic situation as the electronic road pricing system charge the motorist a fee for using the road, but did not actually solve the traffic problem" - other than the fact that it actually does. Having this article directly contradicting the article on ERP doesn't seem right.

Also, the author quoted Dr Paul Barter on the direction LTA should make - while this would be fine if there was a full article on LTA discussing the pros and cons of LTA policies, keeping the quote in there isn't right - especially when the context of the quote, the review of land transport in Singapore by the end of this year followed by a white paper, isn't stated.

And lines such as, "Analysts say the Singapore public transport system is still some way from being world-class" are not only unsubstantiated, but impossible to do so - it is biased. What, after all, is the definition of 'world-class'? I hardly think Singaporean public transport is that great, but what constitutes world class?

That was followed by "A main issue is to cut waiting time by increasing the frequency of public transport services significantly.

The train network also needs to be expanded."

In the prior, again, this was not substantiated. In fact, the dip in public transport usage is logical - even if buses come every few seconds, driving your own car with 9 expressways and a set of well-planned roads would always seem more attractive to choice drivers. While this is a possible explanation, it was stated as a matter of fact. Also, the second line on the trains is an opinion stated as a fact - BRT proponents would prefer converting lanes into dedicated bus lanes for some sort of express bus service, for example. Light rail proponents would argue a system of at-grade light rails or trams feeding into the current MRT system is ideal. My point is that while I agree that the MRT system should have been more than 3 measely lines (compared with 8 expressways, no wonder more and more people are switching to cars, but I digress ), using words like 'need' indicate that this is an absolute fact. The LTA would argue back that the amount of potential passengers isn't there to justify more MRT lines - and this is serviced by the fact the Northeast Line isn't in the black. Rajan Rishayakaran 15:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Land Transport Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Land Transport Authority. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131002085844/http://ltaacademy.lta.gov.sg/abtus_ltaacademy.htm to http://ltaacademy.lta.gov.sg/abtus_ltaacademy.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic