Talk:Langley Fox Building Partnership v De Valence
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Klbrain in topic Proposed merge of Langley Fox Building Partnership (Pty) Ltd v De Valence with Langley Fox Building Partnership v De Valence
 | This page was proposed for deletion by The Alternate Mako (talk · contribs) on 28 November 2021. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the De Valence v Langley Fox Building Partnership (W) page were merged into Langley Fox Building Partnership v De Valence on 9 October 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Proposed merge of Langley Fox Building Partnership (Pty) Ltd v De Valence with Langley Fox Building Partnership v De Valence
editThese are both on the same topic, but one is essentially an appeal for the other. It would be more appropriate to merge them together, since they are so closely related Mako001 (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- The first is a redirect to here. There is nothing to merge. I removed the merge tag. Polyamorph (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think Mako meant to propose merger with De Valence v Langley Fox Building Partnership (W). I agree that the two articles should be merged, and I have tagged De Valence v Langley Fox Building Partnership (W) with Template:Mergeto. I have no preference whether this article on the appeal is merged into the other article on the Witwatersrand division decision, or whether the other article on the Witwatersrand division decision is merged into this article on the appeal. I am not sure if we have a naming convention for this kind of article. James500 (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
