Talk:Lanhydrock House

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lanhydrock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515071635/http://www.magakernow.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docid=79ba408d-7c02-499e-8cd6-b18dd48de58d&version=-1 to http://www.magakernow.org.uk/idoc.ashx?docid=79ba408d-7c02-499e-8cd6-b18dd48de58d&version=-1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100430133718/http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-lanhydrock.htm to http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-lanhydrock.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lanhydrock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20090103160354/http://cwic.cornwall.gov.uk/cwic-sql/pc_det.asp?1317 to http://cwic.cornwall.gov.uk/cwic-sql/pc_det.asp?1317

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Split discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Split. As bulk of info is about the house, the page was moved to Lanhydrock House and info on parish copied back into Lanhydrock. --Salix alba (talk): 09:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

---

Lanhydrock House is notable as a Grade I listed building, so should have its own article. At the moment, the article about the whole place is just dominated by information about the house, which is over 90% of the article text. Better to have separate article for the house, with a few lines in the Lanhydrock article only. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Looking at the article, your right, it is very much dominated by the house, but the house comes with the estate, which is rather big and important but probably not notable enough to haves its own article. I would suggest splitting the article into Lanhydrock (Civil Parish) and Lanhydrock (estate). HenryTemplo (talk) 10:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Would agree with HenryTemplo - this would be best split into one article for the estate and another for the parish. Joseph2302, are you willing to split the article? Gazamp (talk) 20:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I think a split would be good, one article for the parish, one for the house & estate. DuncanHill (talk) 20:19, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

National Trust pilot

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)