This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lanka Premier League, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Lanka Premier LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject Lanka Premier LeagueTemplate:WikiProject Lanka Premier LeagueLanka Premier League articles
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
@Obi2canibe: Hi ! Those article which you mentioned to propose to be merged .That articles should not be merged because this article content is different and good information.Hope you will understand.Best Regards !(Fade258 (talk) 01:56, 14 December 2020 (UTC))Reply
Obi2canibe, don't agree with you. many LPL related articles, templates and categories that have been unnecessarily created in the past few weeks. About which content are you talking about? Can you provide with an example? Are you talking about categories, articles and templates created by project that were really necessary but before you they're nothing. Moreover, see List of Pakistan Super League umpires, List of Indian Premier League umpires & List of Bangladesh Premier League umpires. These are not merged but exist separately. If you say that those lists are longer than this, that is due to their big number of seasons. Whereas this league is in its inaugural season. Agreeing with Human's reply, I would say that you don't seem to be familiar with cricket articles. So, this wasn't a good suggestion to merge. Empire ASTalk!05:32, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
If anyone wants to bring the articles of Pakistan and India or any other articles listing captains and umpires up for AfD I'd probably support them being deleted too. Bottom line, pass the notability guideline or it doesn't belong. Maybe we should get rid of 2/3's of all articles on Wikipedia because they don't meet the requirements. Bring them up for AfD and let editors decide. All we can decide on is what is presented. If enough articles are deleted then maybe we can get some clarification and possibly a rules change. Until then, WP:N is the ruling guideline for notability and inclusion. All SNG's can be used to presume notability but they do not prove notability. I would also encourage you to look at WP:NOT to see what Wikipedia is not. As I stated, these are current Wikipedia guidelines and policies. They are not my express beliefs nor do they reflect my opinions. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 18:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments1 person in discussion
A large amount of the content of this page seems to be made up of table of fairly indiscriminate statistics which are copied from CricInfo. Unless anyone cmes up with a rationale for keeping these here, I would propose removing them. If anyone wants to split them off into their own article then that might be appropriate, but, honestly, they're pretty boring even then. Blue Square Thing (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply