Talk:Lansing Mall

Latest comment: 6 years ago by TenPoundHammer in topic GA Review

Untitled

edit

Well, I think you did succeed in doing it. This is a defensible article. DGG (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I still can't find a single source on the original anchors though. I've been told Federal's, Arbaugh's (or Wurzburg's, or maybe both), and The Fair, but I can't verify any of them. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 13:20, 21 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Lansing Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Lansing Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lansing Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lansing Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vami IV (talk · contribs) 00:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Opening statement

edit

For replying to Reviewer comment, please use   Done,   Fixed,   Added,   Not done,   Doing..., or   Removed, followed by any comment you'd like to make. I will be crossing out my comments as they are redressed, and only mine. A detailed, section-by-section review will follow. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 00:10, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

History

edit
  • The article never describes what exactly Wurzburg's is.
  •   Done Clarified that it was a department store.
  • The Lansing Mall was built just outside the city of Lansing, Michigan, the state's capital, within Delta Township along M-43 (Saginaw Highway). Built by Forbes-Cohen, it officially opened to the public on July 31, 1969. Reduce this to one sentence; it's kind of redundant as it is.
  •   Done Copy edited.
  • Reduce "1990s and 2000s" to a === header, and change the name to something like "1990s to present."
  •   Done Changed header.
  • Panera Bread[22] MOS:REFPUNCT
  •   Done I knew that you'd point this out, so I fixed it before you noted it.
edit

Dissolve and disperse all two pictures in the gallery in the article prose.

  •   Done Pictures moved.

GA progress

edit
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.